In addition to LUHC’s rebuttals, above, here are a couple more things –

UNTRUTH #1: “… only ever offered to people on a temporary basis”.

In real-life, not Lambeth’s parallel dimension, many Co-ops were working, in tandem with Lambeth council, on becoming Permanent Co-ops. WE HAVE THE COUNCIL’S OWN MINUTES THAT SHOW THIS. Like to see them, Lib?

UNTRUTH #2: ” … We have guaranteed every shortlife resident the opportunity (to) become a council tenant on a secure lifetime tenancy in a different property that meets their needs”.
Actually, until Peter Robbins’ interview in the South London Press recently, we had never heard about this offer of a secure lifetime tenancy. Many people have felt forced into accepting rehousing in properties with restricted tenancies because they were afraid of being made homeless otherwise.

Lib Peck is either unwittingly regurgitating the party line verbatim, or is knowingly churning out dross to placate the people who find the council’s actions abhorrent.

So, which is it, Lib? Are you naive, or are you lying?